Project 2: Processional Form Overview & Rubric
- Due No Due Date
- Points 100
- Submitting a file upload
Processional Form
- Project Begins: Sept. 26th
- Final Reviews: Oct. 26th
GROUPS
GROUP I | GROUP II | GROUP III |
Isabella Yang | Lily Hogan | Maalik Harris |
Chloe Martin | Emma Brosseau | Wyatt Jenkins |
Megan Squire | Ava Glennon | Betsy Ricke |
Bergen Koentopf | Addison Aune | Nathanael Hasso |
Priya Gala | Ethan McGuire | Maycin Sansgard |
Galvin Smith | Camryn Lair | Joseph Friedman |
OVERVIEW
Objective:
We will collaborate, working within groups to design and construct a large-scale sculptural form leading up to a coordinated performance on campus. The themes explored within the project include color, form, volume, materiality, and movement. Your group, along with your class peers, will perform your sculptures on-site together by leading the series of forms from location to location on a pre-planned route orchestrated by studio instructors.
Integrating all group members' voices and evolving design work is an essential focus of the project. All group members will play a part in bringing the processional form to life. Well-designed processional forms are dynamic, consider materials usage, creative construction methods that include movement within and/or of the sculpture. Groups will consider, solve, and understand how the processional form moves and how the movement impacts the design of the form and performance.
Materials and Fabrication:
Cardboard, durable papers, wire, string, paint, and more! Consideration and implementation of materiality and fabrication contributes to the success of the project outcome. When possible, we will consider the challenges of using reclaimed and recycled materials, being mindful to establish goals to limit waste.
Collaboration is a Group Effort:
Productive collaborations are a central part of every design career; working with others is an exciting way to amplify your collective efforts and to see your ideas develop together. Being reliable and responsible, and pulling your weight with your group is necessary to have a successful experience. Communication is key. Allow all to share thoughts and be heard within the design process. It is expected that all group members are contributing to the project. Though project 2 is a group project, grades are individual. This is impacted in part by the evidence of contribution within the group and completion of individual components. As part of the conclusion of the project, a confidential self and peer evaluation will be submitted to the studio instructor.
Exercises
Navigating through the project in your group, you will explore each exercise in the following sequential order:
Ex. 4: Fabrication and Performance
Problem solve and reiterate together as a collaborative group through the challenges working at full-scale. As a processional form, the function of moving through spaces, mobility concerns within the design, and reliability of material use will present itself at this time. Keep your design hat on and embrace failure as you work together to resolve design issues and find solutions.
The outcome of Ex. 4 is a full-scale Processional Form that will move in procession around campus during the last designated class session of Project 2. Keep in check mobility, kinetic function, and how group members works together to parade the sculptural form during the procession.
High quality of craft and durability of the design are expected.
Document the development of the project and curate a collection of final documentation of the processional form as prescribed by your studio instructor.
Related Exercise MLOs
MLO 2.8 Build the final full-scale processional form demonstrating spatial form objectives, function of mobility, performative intentions, and success of storability within the design.
MLO 2.10 Demonstrate a sophistication of craft, durability, and design of material use and fabrication in the full-scale processional form.
MLO 2.11 Be able to curate documentation of the development and final product of the processional form both as an object artifact and in a processional performance.
Rubric
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Participation
Engagement with the instructor and project group
peers.
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
|||||
Participation
Preparedness with materials and supplies to
participate.
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
|||||
Participation
Productive during workdays.
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
|||||
Participation
Class activities: in-progress reviews, small group discussions, and presentations with instructor and project group peers.
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
|||||
Ex. 1 Color Analysis
Understanding / Conceptualization of ability to record color use from direct influence of an assigned object
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
|||||
Ex. 1 Color Analysis
Documentation and exploration of color use through careful and sophisticated application of color exercises
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
|||||
Ex. 1 Color Analysis
Craft & Quality demonstrated throughout each phase of color analysis studies
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
|||||
Ex. 2 Ideation
Understanding / Conceptualization evolution of initial color studies figures is demonstrated in the play and depth of ideational concept development through a series of model building exercises, consideration of spatial form, imagined function of mobility, performative possibilities
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
|||||
Ex. 2 Ideation
Documentation and further exploration of initial color studies figures is demonstrated in the play and depth of ideational concept development through a series of model-building exercises, consideration of spatial form, imagined function of mobility, performative possibilities
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
|||||
Ex. 2 Ideation
Quality of craft and execution of ideas that demonstrate spatial form objectives, imagined function of mobility, performative possibilities, and suggestion of size and storability of design approaches
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
|||||
Ex. 3 Prototyping
Understanding / Conceptualization of material use for fabrication studies maquettes. Consideration for spatial form objectives, function of mobility, and final processional goals creativity.
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
|||||
Ex. 3 Prototyping
Documentation and exploration of material studies for fabrication of maquettes. Consideration for spatial form objectives, function of mobility, and final processional goals
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
|||||
Ex. 3 Prototyping
Craft and quality of material for fabrication studies maquettes. Consideration for spatial form objectives, function of mobility, and final processional goals.
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
|||||
Ex. 3 Prototyping
Effective communication outlining spatial form objectives, the function of mobility, and final processional goals.
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
|||||
Ex. 4 Final Procession
Understanding / Conceptualization of the final full-scale processional form demonstrates spatial form objectives, function of mobility, performative intentions, and success of storability within the design.
This includes the sophistication of craft, durability of the product, and the careful fabrication of material use at fullscale of the processional form.
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
|||||
Ex. 4 Final Procession
Performance & Exhibition demonstrated by carrying out
spatial form objectives, function of mobility, performative intentions, and success of storability within the design. This includes the sophistication of craft, durability of the product, and the careful fabrication of material use at fullscale of the processional form.
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
|||||
Ex. 4 Final Procession
Craft and quality of the final full-scale processional form demonstrates spatial form objectives, function of mobility, performative intentions, and success of storability within the design.
This includes the sophistication of craft, durability of the product, and the careful fabrication of material use at fullscale of the processional form.
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
|||||
Communication
Success of and understanding of
concepts introduced in the project are made evident by the display of visual artifacts produced and the makers verbal participation and efforts to clarify and describe their experiences through the evolving exercises. - Display of visual artifacts for progress reviews, small group discussions, and presentations with instructor and project group peers
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
|||||
Collaboration
Success and understanding of concepts introduced in the project are made evident by the display of visual artifacts produced. Clear project goals were explored and supported by participation efforts. Individual's contributions to the group goals were visible in the success of the final review.
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
|||||
Final Review
Craft and quality of final works are successfully demonstrated as evidenced in the display of visual artifacts produced.
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
|||||
Total Points:
100
out of 100
|